Combination therapy with dexamethasone intravitreal implant and macular grid laser in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion.
Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2014
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To test a combination of dexamethasone intravitreal
implant with macular grid laser formacular edema in
patients with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).
DESIGN: Prospective interventional, randomized, multicenter
study.
METHODS: Patients with macular edema secondary to
BRVO underwent an Ozurdex intravitreal implant at
baseline. After 1 month, patients were randomly assigned
to 2 study groups. Patients in Group 1 were followed up
monthly and retreated with Ozurdex implant whenever
there was a recurrence of macular edema or a decrease
in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). In Group 2
patients macular grid laser was performed between weeks
6 and 8. After that, patients were followed up and
retreated as for Group 1.
RESULTS: In Group 1 at 4 months, mean BCVA was
0.49 ± 0.35 logMAR and central retinal thickness (CRT)
was 391±172mm; both improved significantly at 6months,
to 0.32 ± 0.29 logMAR and 322 ± 160mm, respectively. In
Group 2, CRT was reduced significantly to 291 ± 76 mmat
4months, andBCVAimproved to0.25±0.20logMAR.At
the final visit, BCVA was 0.18 ± 0.14 logMAR and mean
CRT was 271 ± 44 mm. The number of Ozurdex implants
at 4 months was 12 of 25 (48%) in Group 1 patients vs 3 of
25 (12%) inGroup 2 patients (P[.012). At 6months 3 of
25 patients (12%) in Group 1 vs 0 of 25 (0%) in Group 2
(P [ .23) were retreated.
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of Ozurdex implant
and macular grid laser is synergistic in increasing BCVA
and lengthening the time between injections.
implant with macular grid laser formacular edema in
patients with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).
DESIGN: Prospective interventional, randomized, multicenter
study.
METHODS: Patients with macular edema secondary to
BRVO underwent an Ozurdex intravitreal implant at
baseline. After 1 month, patients were randomly assigned
to 2 study groups. Patients in Group 1 were followed up
monthly and retreated with Ozurdex implant whenever
there was a recurrence of macular edema or a decrease
in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). In Group 2
patients macular grid laser was performed between weeks
6 and 8. After that, patients were followed up and
retreated as for Group 1.
RESULTS: In Group 1 at 4 months, mean BCVA was
0.49 ± 0.35 logMAR and central retinal thickness (CRT)
was 391±172mm; both improved significantly at 6months,
to 0.32 ± 0.29 logMAR and 322 ± 160mm, respectively. In
Group 2, CRT was reduced significantly to 291 ± 76 mmat
4months, andBCVAimproved to0.25±0.20logMAR.At
the final visit, BCVA was 0.18 ± 0.14 logMAR and mean
CRT was 271 ± 44 mm. The number of Ozurdex implants
at 4 months was 12 of 25 (48%) in Group 1 patients vs 3 of
25 (12%) inGroup 2 patients (P[.012). At 6months 3 of
25 patients (12%) in Group 1 vs 0 of 25 (0%) in Group 2
(P [ .23) were retreated.
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of Ozurdex implant
and macular grid laser is synergistic in increasing BCVA
and lengthening the time between injections.
Tipologia CRIS:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Elenco autori:
Pichi, F; Specchia, Claudia; Vitale, L; Lembo, A; Morara, M; Veronese, C; Ciardella, Ap; Nucci, P.
Link alla scheda completa:
Pubblicato in: