Patterns of practice and survival in a retrospective analysis of 1722 adult astrocytoma patients treated between 1985 and 2001 in 12 italian radiation oncology centers
Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2006
Abstract:
Patterns of practice and survival in a retrospective analysis of 1722 adult astrocytoma patients treated between 1985 and 2001 in 12 Italian radiation oncology centers
Volume 65, Issue 3 , Pages 788-799, 1 July 2006
Stefano Maria Magrini, Umberto Ricardi, , Riccardo Santoni, Marco Krengli, Marco Lupattelli, Ines Cafaro, Silvia Scoccianti, Claudia Menichelli, Filippo Bertoni, Riccardo Maurizi Enrici, Vincenzo Tombolini, Michela Buglione, Luigi Pirtoli
Purpose: To analyze the patterns of practice and survival in a series of 1722 adult astrocytoma patients treated in 12 Italian radiotherapy centers.
Methods and Materials: A total of 1722 patients were treated with postoperative radiotherapy (90% World Health Organization [WHO] Grade 3–4, 62% male, 44% aged >60 years, 25% with severe neurologic deficits, 44% after gross total resection, 52% with high-dose radiotherapy, and 16% with chemotherapy). Variations in the clinical–therapeutic features in three subsequent periods (1985 through 2001) were evaluated, along with overall survival for the different subgroups.
Results: The proportion of women, of older patients, of those with worse neurologic performance status (NPS), with WHO Grade 4, and with smaller tumors increased with time, as did the proportion of those treated with radical surgery, hypofractionated radiotherapy, and more sophisticated radiotherapy techniques, after staging procedures progressively became more accurate. The main prognostic factors for overall survival were age, sex, neurologic performance status, WHO grade, extent of surgery, and radiation dose.
Conclusions: Recently, broader selection criteria for radiotherapy were adopted, together with simpler techniques, smaller total doses, and larger fraction sizes for the worse prognostic categories. Younger, fit patients are treated more aggressively, more often in association with chemotherapy. Survival did not change over time. The accurate evaluation of neurologic status is therefore of utmost importance before the best treatment option for the individual patient is chosen.
Volume 65, Issue 3 , Pages 788-799, 1 July 2006
Stefano Maria Magrini, Umberto Ricardi, , Riccardo Santoni, Marco Krengli, Marco Lupattelli, Ines Cafaro, Silvia Scoccianti, Claudia Menichelli, Filippo Bertoni, Riccardo Maurizi Enrici, Vincenzo Tombolini, Michela Buglione, Luigi Pirtoli
Purpose: To analyze the patterns of practice and survival in a series of 1722 adult astrocytoma patients treated in 12 Italian radiotherapy centers.
Methods and Materials: A total of 1722 patients were treated with postoperative radiotherapy (90% World Health Organization [WHO] Grade 3–4, 62% male, 44% aged >60 years, 25% with severe neurologic deficits, 44% after gross total resection, 52% with high-dose radiotherapy, and 16% with chemotherapy). Variations in the clinical–therapeutic features in three subsequent periods (1985 through 2001) were evaluated, along with overall survival for the different subgroups.
Results: The proportion of women, of older patients, of those with worse neurologic performance status (NPS), with WHO Grade 4, and with smaller tumors increased with time, as did the proportion of those treated with radical surgery, hypofractionated radiotherapy, and more sophisticated radiotherapy techniques, after staging procedures progressively became more accurate. The main prognostic factors for overall survival were age, sex, neurologic performance status, WHO grade, extent of surgery, and radiation dose.
Conclusions: Recently, broader selection criteria for radiotherapy were adopted, together with simpler techniques, smaller total doses, and larger fraction sizes for the worse prognostic categories. Younger, fit patients are treated more aggressively, more often in association with chemotherapy. Survival did not change over time. The accurate evaluation of neurologic status is therefore of utmost importance before the best treatment option for the individual patient is chosen.
Tipologia CRIS:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Elenco autori:
Magrini, Stefano Maria; Ricardi, U; Santoni, R; Krengli, M; Lupattelli, M; Cafaro, I; Scoccianti, S; Menichelli, C; Bertoni, F; Enrici, Rm; Tombolini, V; BUGLIONE DI MONALE E BASTIA, Michela; Pirtoli, L.
Link alla scheda completa:
Pubblicato in: