NT-proBNP and high-intensity care for acute heart failure: the STRONG-HF trial

Background and aims: STRONG-HF showed that rapid up-titration of guideline-recommended medical therapy (GRMT), in a high intensity care (HIC) strategy, was associated with better outcomes compared to usual care (UC). The aim of this study was to assess the role of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) at baseline and its changes early during up-titration. Methods: A total of 1077 patients hospitalized for acute heart failure (HF) and with a >10% NT-proBNP decrease from screening (i.e. admission) to randomization (i.e. pre-discharge), were included. Patients in HIC were stratified by further NT-proBNP changes from randomization to 1 week later as decreased (≥30% decrease), stable (<30% decrease to ≤10% increase) or increased (>10% increase). The primary endpoint was 180-day HF readmission or death. Results: The effect of HIC vs. UC was independent of baseline NT-proBNP. Patients in the HIC group with stable or increased NT-proBNP were older, with more severe acute HF and worse renal and liver function. Per protocol, patients with increased NT-proBNP received more diuretics and were up-titrated more slowly during the first weeks after discharge. However, by 6 months they reached 70.4% optimal GRMT doses, compared with 80.3% for those with NT-proBNP decrease. As a result, the primary endpoint at 60 and 90 days occurred in 8.3% and 11.1% of patients with increased NT-proBNP vs 2.2% and 4.0% in those with decreased NT-proBNP (p=0.039 and p=0.045, respectively). However, no difference in outcome was found at 180 days (13.5% vs. 13.2%; p=0.93). Conclusions: Among patients with acute HF enrolled in STRONG-HF, HIC reduced 180-day HF readmission or death regardless of baseline NT-proBNP. GRMT up-titration early post-discharge utilizing increased NT-proBNP as guidance to increase diuretic therapy and reduce the GRMT up-titration rate resulted in the same 180-day outcomes regardless of early post-discharge NT-proBNP change.