Redefining diabetes mellitus treatments according to different mechanisms beyond hypoglycaemic effect

Early epidemiologic studies in type 2 diabetes suggested that the long-term risk of microvascular and macrovascular complications increase progressively as glucose concentrations rise, inspiring the pursuit of near euglycaemia as a means of preventing these complications in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Evidence emerging over the past decade, however, showed that the aggressive efforts often needed to achieve low HbA1c levels can ultimately lead to worse clinical outcomes, greater risk of severe hypoglycaemia, and higher burden of treatment. The acknowledgment of the disappointing results obtained with therapies aimed exclusively at improving glycaemic control has led in recent years to a substantial paradigm shift in the treatment of the diabetic patient. The results obtained first with GLP-1RAs and more recently even more with SGLT2i on mortality and CV events have made it clear how other mechanisms, beyond the hypoglycaemic effect, are at the basis of the benefits observed in several cardiovascular outcome trials. And as evidence of the great revolution of thought we are experiencing, there is the recognition of gliflozins as drugs for the treatment not only of diabetic patients but also of non-diabetic patients suffering from HF, as reported in the latest ESC/HFA guidelines. Surely, we still have a lot to understand, but it is certain that this is the beginning of a new era.