Data di Pubblicazione:
2006
Abstract:
Neuroimaging findings, including repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) interference, point to an engagement of
prefrontal cortex (PFC) in learning and memory. Whether parietal cortex (PC) activity is causally linked to successful episodic
encoding and retrieval is still uncertain. We compared the effects of event-related active or sham rTMS (a rapid-rate train coincident
to the very first phases of memoranda presentation) to the left or right intraparietal sulcus, during a standardized episodic memory
task of visual scenes, with those obtained in a fully matched sample of subjects who received rTMS on left or right dorsolateral PFC
during the same task. In these subjects, specific hemispheric effects of rTMS included interference with encoding after left stimulation
and disruption of retrieval after right stimulation. The interference of PC-rTMS on encoding ⁄ retrieval performance was negligible,
lacking specificity even when higher intensities of stimulation were applied. However, right PC-rTMS of the same intensity lengthened
reaction times in the context of a purely attentive visuospatial task. These results suggest that the activity of intraparietal sulci shown
in several funtional magnetic resonance studies on memory, unlike that of the dorsolateral PFC, is not causally engaged to a useful
degree in memory encoding and retrieval of visual scenes. The parietal activations accompanying the memorization processes could
reflect the engagement of a widespread brain attentional network, in which interference on a single ‘node’ is insufficient for an overt
disruption of memory performance.
prefrontal cortex (PFC) in learning and memory. Whether parietal cortex (PC) activity is causally linked to successful episodic
encoding and retrieval is still uncertain. We compared the effects of event-related active or sham rTMS (a rapid-rate train coincident
to the very first phases of memoranda presentation) to the left or right intraparietal sulcus, during a standardized episodic memory
task of visual scenes, with those obtained in a fully matched sample of subjects who received rTMS on left or right dorsolateral PFC
during the same task. In these subjects, specific hemispheric effects of rTMS included interference with encoding after left stimulation
and disruption of retrieval after right stimulation. The interference of PC-rTMS on encoding ⁄ retrieval performance was negligible,
lacking specificity even when higher intensities of stimulation were applied. However, right PC-rTMS of the same intensity lengthened
reaction times in the context of a purely attentive visuospatial task. These results suggest that the activity of intraparietal sulci shown
in several funtional magnetic resonance studies on memory, unlike that of the dorsolateral PFC, is not causally engaged to a useful
degree in memory encoding and retrieval of visual scenes. The parietal activations accompanying the memorization processes could
reflect the engagement of a widespread brain attentional network, in which interference on a single ‘node’ is insufficient for an overt
disruption of memory performance.
Tipologia CRIS:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Elenco autori:
S., Rossi; P., Pasqualetti; G., Zito; F., Vecchio; S. F., Cappa; Miniussi, Carlo; C., Babiloni; P. M., Rossini
Link alla scheda completa:
Pubblicato in: