Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNIBS
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Strutture
  • Competenze
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Professioni
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Terza Missione

Competenze & Professionalità
Logo UNIBS

|

Competenze & Professionalità

unibs.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Strutture
  • Competenze
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Professioni
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Terza Missione
  1. Pubblicazioni

Accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) among the Italian Dementia Centers: a study by the Italian DLB study group (DLB-SINdem)

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2022
Abstract:
Introduction: Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) may represent a diagnostic challenge, since its clinical picture overlaps with other dementia. Two toolkits have been developed to aid the clinician to diagnose DLB: the Lewy Body Composite Risk Score (LBCRS) and the Assessment Toolkit for DLB (AT-DLB). We aim to evaluate the reliability of these two questionnaires, and their ability to enhance the interpretation of the international consensus diagnostic criteria. Methods: LBCRS and AT-DLB were distributed to 135 Italian Neurological Centers for Cognitive Decline and Dementia (CDCDs), with the indication to administer them to all patients with dementia referred within the subsequent 3 months. We asked to subsequently apply consensus criteria for DLB diagnosis, to validate the diagnostic accuracy of the two toolkits. Results: A total of 23 Centers joined the study; 1854 patients were enrolled. We found a prevalence of possible or probable DLB of 13% each (26% total), according to the consensus criteria. LBCRS toolkit showed good reliability, with a Cronbach alpha of 0.77, stable even after removing variables from the construct. AT-DLB toolkit Cronbach alpha was 0.52 and, after the subtraction of the “cognitive fluctuation” criterion, was only 0.31. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were higher for LBCRS vs. AT-DLB. However, when simultaneously considered in the logistic models, AT-DLB showed a better performance (p < 0.001). Overall, the concordance between LBCRS positive and AT-DLB possible/probable was of 78.02% Conclusions: In a clinical setting, the LBCRS and AT-DLB questionnaires have good accuracy for DLB diagnosis.
Tipologia CRIS:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Keywords:
Clinical diagnosis; Cognitive impairment; Consensus criteria; Dementia; Dementia with Lewy bodies; Diagnostic accuracy; Diagnostic toolkits
Elenco autori:
Russo, M; Carrarini, C; Di Iorio, A; Pellegrino, R; Bruni, Ac; Caratozzolo, S; Chiari, A; Pretta, S; Marra, C; Cotelli, Ms; Arighi, A; Fumagalli, Gg; Cataruzza, T; Caso, F; Paci, C; Rosso, M; Amici, S; Giannandrea, D; Pilotto, A; Luzzi, S; Castellano, A; D'Antonio, F; Luca, A; Gelosa, G; Piccoli, T; Mauri, M; Agosta, F; Babiloni, C; Borroni, B; Bozzali, M; Filippi, M; Galimberti, D; Monastero, R; Muscio, C; Parnetti, L; Perani, D; Serra, L; Silani, V; Tiraboschi, P; Cagnin, A; Padovani, A; Bonanni, L
Autori di Ateneo:
BORRONI BARBARA
PADOVANI ALESSANDRO
PILOTTO ANDREA
Link alla scheda completa:
https://iris.unibs.it/handle/11379/565963
Pubblicato in:
NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
Journal
  • Assistenza
  • Privacy
  • Utilizzo dei cookie
  • Note legali

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.1.0