Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNIBS
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills
  • Outputs
  • Jobs
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • Third Mission

Expertise & Skills
Logo UNIBS

|

Expertise & Skills

unibs.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills
  • Outputs
  • Jobs
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • Third Mission
  1. Outputs

Does the flypaper model stick? A test of the relative performance of the flypaper and conventional models of local government budgetary behaviour

Academic Article
Publication Date:
1991
Abstract:
Two of the most widely referred to models of local (or state) budgetary behaviour are developed and tested. The models considered are a variant of the flypaper model (see, for example, Courant et al., 1979 and Oates, 1979) and a conventional model which builds on the seminal work of Wilde (1969, 1971). The models are developed in a manner which allows them to be tested empirically using data for English local governments. Two types of test are employed: the ability of the two models to explain the variations in expenditure levels across local governments within any given fiscal year; the ability of the models to predict future levels of expenditure given changes to local government budget constraints (as brought about, for example, by changs in grants-in-aid from central government). © 1991 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
CRIS type:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
List of contributors:
Barnett, R. R.; Levaggi, R.; Smith, P.
Authors of the University:
LEVAGGI Rosella
Handle:
https://iris.unibs.it/handle/11379/553395
Published in:
PUBLIC CHOICE
Journal
  • Support
  • Privacy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notes

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.0.0