Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNIBS
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Strutture
  • Competenze
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Professioni
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Terza Missione

Competenze & Professionalità
Logo UNIBS

|

Competenze & Professionalità

unibs.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Strutture
  • Competenze
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Professioni
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Terza Missione
  1. Pubblicazioni

A world-wide study on delirium assessments and presence of protocols

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2024
Abstract:
Background Delirium is a common complication of older people in hospitals, rehabilitation and long-term facilities.Objective To assess the worldwide use of validated delirium assessment tools and the presence of delirium management protocols.Design Secondary analysis of a worldwide one-day point prevalence study on World Delirium Awareness Day, 15 March 2023.Setting Cross-sectional online survey including hospitals, rehabilitation and long-term facilities.Methods Participating clinicians reported data on delirium, the presence of protocols, delirium assessments, delirium-awareness interventions, non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions, and ward/unit-specific barriers.Results Data from 44 countries, 1664 wards/units and 36 048 patients were analysed. Validated delirium assessments were used in 66.7% (n = 1110) of wards/units, 18.6% (n = 310) used personal judgement or no assessment, and 10% (n = 166) used other assessment methods. A delirium management protocol was reported in 66.8% (n = 1094) of wards/units. The presence of protocols for delirium management varied across continents, ranging from 21.6% (on 21/97 wards/units) in Africa to 90.4% (235/260) in Australia, similar to the use of validated delirium assessments with 29.6% (29/98) in Africa to 93.5% (116/124) in North America. Wards/units with a delirium management protocol [n = 1094/1664, 66.8%] were more likely to use a validated delirium test than those without a protocol [odds ratio 6.97 (95% confidence interval 5.289-9.185)]. The presence of a delirium protocol increased the chances for valid delirium assessment and, likely, evidence-based interventions.Conclusion Wards/units that reported the presence of delirium management protocols had a higher probability of using validated delirium assessments tools to assess for delirium.
Tipologia CRIS:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Keywords:
assessments; delirium; encephalopathy; older people; patient safety; protocols; quality improvement
Elenco autori:
Nydahl, Peter; Liu, Keibun; Bellelli, Giuseppe; Benbenishty, Julie; van den Boogaard, Mark; Caplan, Gideon; Chung, Chi Ryang; Elhadi, Muhammed; Gurjar, Mohan; Heras-La Calle, Gabi; Hoffmann, Magdalena; Jeitziner, Marie-Madlen; Krewulak, Karla; Mailhot, Tanya; Morandi, Alessandro; Nawa, Ricardo Kenji; Oh, Esther S; Collet, Marie O; Paulino, Maria Carolina; Lindroth, Heidi; von Haken, Rebecca; Null, Null
Autori di Ateneo:
MORANDI ALESSANDRO
Link alla scheda completa:
https://iris.unibs.it/handle/11379/608585
Pubblicato in:
AGE AND AGEING
Journal
  • Assistenza
  • Privacy
  • Utilizzo dei cookie
  • Note legali

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.1.0