Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNIBS
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Strutture
  • Competenze
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Professioni
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Terza Missione

Competenze & Professionalità
Logo UNIBS

|

Competenze & Professionalità

unibs.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Strutture
  • Competenze
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Professioni
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Terza Missione
  1. Pubblicazioni

In-line filtration reduces postoperative venous peripheral phlebitis associated with cannulation: A randomized clinical trial

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2018
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Peripheral venous cannulation is an everyday practice of care for patients undergoing anesthesia and surgery. Particles infused with intravenous fluids (eg, plastic/glass/drugs particulate) contribute to the pathogenesis of peripheral phlebitis. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy of in-line filtration in reducing the incidence of postoperative phlebitis associated with peripheral short-term vascular access. METHODS: In this controlled trial, 268 surgical patients were randomly assigned to in-line filtration and standard care (NCT03193827). The incidence of phlebitis (defined as visual infusion phlebitis [VIP] score, ≥2) within 48 hours was compared between the 2 groups, as well as the onset and severity of phlebitis and the reasons for removal of the cannula. The lifespan of venous cannulae was compared for the in-line filter and no-filter groups through a Kaplan-Meier curve. RESULTS: The incidence of phlebitis within 48 hours postoperatively was 2.2% and 26.9% (difference, 25% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 12%-36%]; odds ratio, 0.05 [0.01-0.15]), respectively, for the in-line fiolter and no-filter groups (P <.001). From 24 to 96 hours postoperatively, patients in the no-filter group had higher VIP scores than those in in-line filter group (P <.001). Venous cannulae in the in-line filter group exhibited prolonged lifespan compared to those in the no-filter group (P =.01). In particular, 64 (47.8%) of cannulae in the in-line filter group and 56 (41.8%) of those in the no-filter group were still in place at 96 hours postoperatively. At the same time point, patients with a VIP score <3 were 100% in the in-line filter group and only 50% for the no-filter group. In-line filtration was a protective factor for postoperative phlebitis (hazard ratio, 0.05 [95% CI, 0.014-0.15]; P <.0001) and cannula removal (hazard ratio, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.52-0.96]; P =.02). CONCLUSIONS: In-line filtration has a protective effect for postoperative phlebitis and prolongs cannula lifespan during peripheral venous cannulation in surgical patients.
Tipologia CRIS:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Elenco autori:
Villa, G.; Chelazzi, C.; Giua, R.; Tofani, L.; Zagli, G.; Boninsegni, P.; Pinelli, F.; De Gaudio, A. R.; Romagnoli, S.
Autori di Ateneo:
CHELAZZI COSIMO
Link alla scheda completa:
https://iris.unibs.it/handle/11379/572406
Pubblicato in:
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA
Journal
  • Assistenza
  • Privacy
  • Utilizzo dei cookie
  • Note legali

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.7.2.0