Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNIBS
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Strutture
  • Competenze
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Professioni
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Terza Missione

Competenze & Professionalità
Logo UNIBS

|

Competenze & Professionalità

unibs.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Strutture
  • Competenze
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Professioni
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Terza Missione
  1. Pubblicazioni

Anatomic reconstruction of the acromioclavicular joint provides the best functional outcomes in the treatment of chronic instability

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2020
Abstract:
Purpose: To systematically review the outcomes of surgical treatments of chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Methods: Studies were identified by electronic databases (Ovid, PubMed). All studies reporting functional and radiological outcomes of surgical treatments of chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocations were included. Following data were extracted: authors and year, study design, level of evidence, number of patients, age, classification of acromioclavicular joint dislocation, time to surgery, surgical technique, follow-up, clinical and imaging outcomes, complications and failures. Descriptive statistics was used, when a data pooling was not possible. Comparable outcomes were pooled to generate summary outcomes reported as frequency-weighted values. Quality appraisal was assessed through the MINORS checklist. Results: Fourty-four studies were included for a total of 1020 shoulders. Mean age of participants was 38 years. Mean follow-up was 32.9 months. Arthroscopic techniques showed better results than open approach (p < 0.0001). Synthetic reconstructions demonstrated better functional outcomes compared to internal fixation and biologic techniques (p < 0.0001). Among biologic techniques, combined coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligaments reconstruction showed better Constant (p = 0.0270) and ASES (p = 0.0113) scores compared to isolated coracoclavicular ligaments reconstruction; anatomic biologic non-augmented graft reconstruction showed better Constant (p < 0.0001), VAS (p < 0.0001) and SSV (p = 0.0177) results compared to augmented techniques. No differences in functional outcomes could be found between anatomic biologic non-augmented graft versus synthetic reconstructions. Overall, methodological quality of the included studies was low. Conclusion: Anatomic reconstructions, both synthetic and biologic, showed the best functional results. Level of evidence: IV.
Tipologia CRIS:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Keywords:
Acromioclavicular joint; Biologic; Chronic; Dislocations; Graft; Instability; Plates; Surgical treatment; Synthetic
Elenco autori:
Sircana, G.; Saccomanno, M. F.; Mocini, F.; Campana, V.; Messinese, P.; Monteleone, A.; Salvi, A.; Scaini, A.; Megaro, A.; Milano, G.
Autori di Ateneo:
MILANO Giuseppe
Link alla scheda completa:
https://iris.unibs.it/handle/11379/540152
Link al Full Text:
https://iris.unibs.it/retrieve/handle/11379/540152/131143/Sircana2020_Article_AnatomicReconstructionOfTheAcr.pdf
Pubblicato in:
KNEE SURGERY, SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY, ARTHROSCOPY
Journal
  • Assistenza
  • Privacy
  • Utilizzo dei cookie
  • Note legali

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.2.0